Seven Thousand Resident Interactions Catalyze Plymouth’s Decade-Long Roadmap for Affordability and Aquifer Safety
Key Points
- Plymouth transitioning from Master Plan to Comprehensive Plan to address interconnected town-wide impacts
- Developable land reduced to less than 10 percent as major growth drivers Pine Hills and Redbrook reach completion
- Three-acre zoning across 71 percent of the town identified as the primary barrier to creating attainable starter homes
- Town currently below the state-mandated 10 percent affordable housing threshold but utilizing a two-year safe harbor period
- Aquifer protection and environmental resiliency established as core requirements for all future land-use decisions
- Proposed implementation matrix assigns specific lead departments and timelines for dozens of strategic goals
- Public comment period for the draft plan remains open through January 25 via the project website
Planning Director Lauren Lind convened a virtual public forum to unveil the draft of the Plymouth Comprehensive Plan, a project that Master Plan Committee Chairperson Stephen Bulletin noted has undergone a significant name change to reflect modern geographic realities. Bulletin explained the shift in terminology, stating, We've discovered that what happens in one part of Plymouth now affects all of Plymouth. For that reason, we need a plan that comprehensively addresses all of Plymouth's needs.
Technical consultant Steve Carney of Stantech highlighted the town's unprecedented community engagement throughout the 18-month process, noting that this community cares about the future, wants to participate and it's been, you know, that is just so exciting to see.
Carney warned that with major revenue drivers like Pine Hills and Redbrook nearing completion, Plymouth faces a fiscal imperative to diversify its tax base, especially as developable land has dwindled to less than 10 percent of the town's total area.
The draft plan centers on a detailed implementation matrix designed to guide municipal departments through the next decade. Project Manager Phil Schaing described the document as a road map for primarily town staff in various departments to refer to and come back to over the next 10 years.
During the interactive portion of the meeting, moderator Regan of Regina Villa Associates ensured all voices were included in the public record, noting that all of the comments submitted in the Q&A are going to be included in the final meeting summary.
Residents like Donna raised geographic-specific concerns, as she was wondering if you had any information about specific opportunities in North Plymouth,
while Frank inquired about the protection of rare plants, the ponds, and other features that are the foundation of the environment.
Resident Eric questioned the long-term sustainability of the water infrastructure, asking if the plan assumes the town will simply continue building a new town well every 3 to 5 years.
The conversation frequently returned to the crisis of housing "attainability," with Town Meeting member Harrison Quinn expressing concern that affordable housing is unattainable for the vast majority of people.
Resident Don asked, Have we satisfied the state’s requirement that a percentage of the housing be affordable?
to which Lind clarified that the town has not met the 10% threshold.
Addressing zoning hurdles, Bulletin noted that 71 percent of Plymouth is currently zoned for three-acre lots, a major barrier to small-scale development. Resident Amy asked about the anticipated timeline for bringing
new zoning proposals to Town Meeting, while Anthony questioned if there was any discussion about short-term rentals and that impact on a fair affordability.
Heather raised concerns about enforcement, asking, What happens if government officials and developers don't want to follow the plan?
Bulletin responded that while the plan is not a strict legal code, it serves as a vital guide for elected officials to say, We have spoken.